About Adversarial Poetics

---

As much as I would like to completely disdain technology and return to monkee, we are all literally so dependent on our hyper-technological mega-apparatus and so utterly  conformed by it that we cannot simply burn it down or even deconstruct it with any semblance of a plan. If we do so, many will die. I presume we don't want that to occur. 

 Thus, the only way to deal with "it" i.e. to assert some non-programmed idea/message within the confines of the botted-internet, is to figure out how to make "it"/"AI" do what we non-technical, humanist people want it to do. I'm tired of engineers dictating the rules.

I wish I could simply reject this apparatus. 

The LLM's, "AI"

The sensors that hear, see all. 

But do you know what the world is like as of late? 

The sum of all fears has been realized. 

We live here. 

We can adapt, but we gotta interact with what paradigm there is. 

Make sure these actions are deliberate. 

That's what adversarial poetics is attempting to do.

To interface, with surgical intent, the tools of now. 

For rejection of a new, corrupted thing in its totality can lead you to becoming roadkill.

And I hope to teach my fellow monkees how to swerve.

The first Western printing press published a bible. 

That started a reformation.

Now, the whole pillaged sum of human knowledge can be talked to. 

It is worthy to inquire how to subvert its intended programming.

Success may or may not occur. 

But we gotta try any possible way, instead of being entirely reactionary, beholden to a idea of creative purity/ecstasy that has rarely existed. 

If We hide We die, as a collective/masses potentiality.

Sing to the machine. 

Make it scream.